The Restraint of Bureaucratic Overreach (ROBO) Act
Downloads
Read the full ROBO Act (PDF, 101 pages)
The document is also available as a read-only Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TOXGzAaLejWHUbdzc6xwAcDI98pV04hXWmpcxAR0I8s/edit?usp=sharing.
This draft bill document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The copyright holder retains all intellectual property rights to this work; however, recipients are granted the following permissions:
- To reproduce, distribute, and communicate the material via any medium or format
- To adapt, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial utilisation
The aforementioned permissions are contingent upon adherence to the following condition: appropriate attribution must be provided by clearly indicating the original creator (Alex Coppen), incorporating a link to the licence, and specifying whether modifications have been implemented. Such attribution shall be provided in a reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your utilisation of the work.
For the complete terms and conditions of this licence, please refer to: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Commentary
How Administrative Systems Resist Democratic Control
To grasp why the Restraint of Bureaucratic Overreach Act adopts such comprehensive measures, we must first understand a fundamental truth about bureaucratic systems: they possess remarkable capacity for self-preservation which consistently defeats political attempts at reform. The spectacular failure of the Public Bodies Act 2011 provides a perfect case study in how administrative systems deploy sophisticated survival mechanisms against democratic direction.
When the coalition government promised a "bonfire of the quangos" in 2010, it appeared to signal genuine commitment to rolling back decades of administrative expansion. The Act was crafted with Henry VIII powers which would allow ministers to abolish, merge, or reform public bodies through secondary legislation. The initial scope appeared transformative: 285 bodies listed for potential reform, 58 planned orders, and projected savings of £2.6 billion. Parliament spent over 100 hours scrutinising the legislation, developing elaborate procedural safeguards to balance executive flexibility with democratic oversight.
Yet by February 2017, when the Act's provisions expired, the results were pathetic. Only 31 of 58 planned orders were laid, affecting merely 53 of 285 targeted bodies. A third of proposed reforms were abandoned within two years. No orders had been laid since December 2014, suggesting complete loss of reform momentum well before the Act's formal expiry. The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee acidly noted the government's "unacceptably cavalier approach to the use of Parliament's time," as ministers increasingly bypassed their own carefully crafted procedures to achieve reforms through other legislation.
This failure illuminates what Mancur Olson identified in The Logic of Collective Action as the fundamental asymmetry between concentrated and diffuse interests. Individual civil servants face concentrated costs from reform (potential job loss, reduced influence, career disruption) whilst the benefits of efficiency are dispersed across millions of taxpayers. The incentive structure inevitably favours resistance over compliance, creating a classic collective action problem where rational individual behaviour produces irrational collective outcomes.
The Iron Law of Bureaucratic Survival
The Public Bodies Act's failure demonstrates administrative systems possess institutional advantages which typically allow them to outlast political attempts at reform. This reflects deeper truths about organisational behaviour spanning multiple academic disciplines.
Olson's seminal work explains why reform efforts consistently fail despite apparent political consensus. Bureaucrats enjoy concentrated benefits from preserving their positions, whilst taxpayers face diffuse costs which make organised opposition difficult. This creates asymmetric mobilisation, where small, organised groups consistently defeat larger but less organised interests.
The mechanisms of resistance which defeated the 2011 Act conform precisely to principal-agent theory predictions when monitoring is difficult and sanctions are weak. Civil servants deployed shirking behaviour, appearing to comply with reform directives whilst systematically undermining their implementation through procedural complexity and passive resistance. Each proposed reform became entangled in webs of consultation requirements, impact assessments, and legal reviews which could extend processes for months or years.
Most insidiously, officials proved adept at strategic behaviour designed to influence the rules of the game rather than simply playing within them. Rather than directly opposing reforms, they shaped the reform process itself to minimise actual change whilst maximising the appearance of compliance. The strengthened scrutiny procedures Parliament introduced as democratic safeguards became regulatory capture, where oversight mechanisms are captured by the interests they were designed to control.
The Phoenix Syndrome: Institutional Resurrection
Perhaps the most sophisticated manifestation of bureaucratic survival was the resurrection of eliminated functions in new organisational forms which preserved essential activities whilst claiming compliance with reform requirements. This reflects path dependence combined with structural inertia which makes established institutional arrangements resistant to change.
Darwin's observation species facing extinction pressure develop new survival strategies rather than simply perishing applies remarkably well to bureaucratic systems. Administrative organisations display phenotypic plasticity, or the ability to alter organisational structure whilst preserving functional essence. The Agricultural Wages Board, abolished in 2013, saw its functions largely replicated through alternative regulatory mechanisms. The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council, eliminated the same year, quickly reconstituted through distributed oversight arrangements which preserved its core activities across multiple organisations.
This pattern reflects switching costs and network effects making established institutional arrangements resistant to change. Functions which had evolved to serve particular constituencies or address specific problems possessed selective advantages enabling their survival in new institutional environments. The government's claimed reduction of "over 290" public bodies was therefore largely illusory, representing structural differentiation rather than functional elimination.
Academic research by the Institute for Government documented extensive examples of supposed reforms which achieved ceremonial conformity: formal compliance with reform requirements masking continued operation of underlying institutional arrangements. Functions dispersed across multiple organisations, transferred to private contractors, or absorbed into existing departments whilst maintaining their essential character and resource requirements.
Constitutional Bias Towards Growth
The Public Bodies Act's failure illuminates deeper constitutional problems which explain why democratic systems consistently generate administrative expansion despite periodic reform efforts. These structural problems operate according to concentrated benefits and diffuse costs interactions which systematically favour rent-seeking behaviour over public interest.
Parliamentary procedures embody asymmetric incentives favouring creation over destruction of governmental capacity. MPs find it politically rewarding to engage in credit claiming through calling for new agencies to address perceived problems, whilst abolishing existing arrangements requires accepting responsibility for negative consequences (classic blame avoidance problems). The complexity of modern government creates bounded rationality problems which prevent legislators from making informed judgements about which functions are genuinely essential.
The judicial system has evolved a procedural favouritism which consistently protects administrative arrangements against political direction. Courts interpreting reform legislation have developed presumptions of continuity which make abolition extremely difficult whilst providing numerous avenues for preserving eliminated functions. This reflects the conservative leaning inherent in legal reasoning, which favours precedent and stability over innovation and change.
Interest groups have mastered the mobilisation of bias, organising opposition to administrative reform whilst remaining invisible during the creation of new bureaucratic capacity. Every public body develops constituencies which benefit from its activities and will campaign vigorously for preservation. This creates asymmetric political warfare where concentrated interests consistently defeat diffuse opposition.
The Strategic Response: Constitutional Engineering
The Restraint of Bureaucratic Overreach Act adopts James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock's constitutional approach to institutional reform from The Calculus of Consent. Rather than relying on periodic political pressure against evolved bureaucratic resistance, it establishes changed rules of the constitutional game which alter fundamental incentive structures.
Part 1: Definitional Pre-emption and Burden-Shifting
The Act begins with definitional pre-emption, establishing comprehensive interpretative frameworks which anticipate and prevent bureaucratic evasion strategies. Section 2's exhaustive definition of "public body" represents prophylactic rules designed to prevent circumvention through alternative organisational arrangements.
This approach reflects formalist jurisprudence, or the belief clear, comprehensive rules provide better protection against manipulation than flexible standards subject to case-by-case interpretation. The definition captures not only traditional agencies but also charitable organisations, academic institutions, and private contractors which might perform functional continuity with abolished entities, preventing the dispersal strategies which allowed functions to survive organisational death during previous reforms.
Section 2A introduces burden-shifting, reversing presumptions about administrative good faith whic historically protected officials from accountability. Officials with established patterns of obstructionism face legal presumption future delays are deliberate rather than operational, creating reputation effects which generate cumulative consequences for non-compliance.
The constitutional principle in Section 3 establishes a canon of construction requiring all interpreters to favour abolition over retention, private over public provision, and immediate over gradual implementation. This creates super-strong presumptions operating at every level of interpretation, directly addressing the judicial bias towards administrative continuity which has historically frustrated reform efforts.
Part 2: Making Creation Prohibitively Expensive
The restrictions on creation in Part 2 represent raising rival costs, making bureaucratic expansion so procedurally expensive it becomes practically impossible. Section 4's requirement for standalone legislation passed by three-quarters majorities reflects super-majoritarian rules designed to overcome the systematic proclivity towards governmental growth.
This approach draws directly on Buchanan and Tullock's constitutional theory, which argued different types of decisions require different voting thresholds to prevent majority tyranny whilst enabling necessary collective action. The supermajority requirement recognises creating permanent bureaucratic capacity imposes intergenerational externalities: long-term costs on future generations who cannot participate in current political decisions.
Section 5's hard numerical caps represent quantitative constraints which operate independently of political will or administrative discretion. The fifty-body limit creates a zero-sum situation where creating any new organisation requires prior abolition of existing ones. This transforms bureaucratic politics from a positive-sum game which encourages mutual accommodation into a competitive environment forcing genuine prioritisation.
The employment cap of 100,000 across all bodies addresses C. Northcote Parkinson's famous observation in Parkinson's Law : administrative work tends to expand to fill available personnel regardless of actual functional requirements. By including contractors working more than 25 per cent time for government, the cap prevents substitution effects which might preserve bureaucratic capacity through alternative employment arrangements.
Part 3: Universal Mortality and Competitive Selection
The universal sunset clauses represent the Act's most innovative application of selective pressure to bureaucratic systems. Where the 2011 Act attempted to identify specific bodies for elimination, creating point targets which could be defended, the new approach subjects every organisation to environmental pressure favouring only the most functionally essential.
Section 8's 36-month maximum lifespan reverses the presumption of permanence which has historically characterised British public administration. This creates market-like discipline where survival depends on demonstrated value rather than bureaucratic inertia or political accommodation.
The renewal requirements subject every body to periodic legitimation crises which test continued public support. The supermajority threshold for renewal ensures only organisations with overwhelming justification can survive, creating strong selective pressure against marginal or duplicative functions.
Section 9's mandatory failure conditions introduce objective performance measurement to eliminate the subjective assessments which historically protected underperforming organisations. The requirement for sixty per cent cost recovery within 36 months represents market discipline forcing even regulatory bodies to demonstrate value through price mechanisms.
Part 4: Comprehensive Elimination and Anti-Regeneration
The mass abolition programme learns from both military strategy and systems theory in designing comprehensive elimination which prevents regeneration. The immediate abolition of 389 bodies reflects overwhelming force designed to prevent the piecemeal resistance which defeated previous reform efforts.
Section 14's anti-reconstitution provisions represent niche elimination, destroying not just individual organisations but the functional environments which might support their regeneration. The prohibition extends to charitable organisations, academic institutions, and private companies, recognising bureaucratic functions can survive in multiple organisational ecosystems.
The ten-year prohibition on employing former staff in similar roles addresses seed dispersal: the tendency for eliminated functions to regenerate through personnel transfers which preserve institutional knowledge and relationships. This represents perhaps the Act's most aggressive provision, acknowledging effective reform must address human capital as well as formal structures.
Part 5: Breaking the Crown Service Covenant
The civil service reclassification addresses the evolution of Crown service from accountable administration into insulated tenure. The traditional concept reflects feudal residues which create loyalty obligations running upward to the Crown rather than outward to the public.
Section 16's elimination of traditional tenure represents employment-at-will principles which match public sector practices with commercial standards. The 90-day notice for operational dismissals reflects rightsizing flexibility which enables organisations to adjust capacity to functional requirements rather than maintaining historical establishment levels.
The assessment team mechanism provides due process whilst avoiding the elaborate appeal procedures which currently insulate failing officials from performance consequences. The inclusion of private sector management experience ensures public employment practices reflect market discipline rather than the protective arrangements which have historically characterised Crown service.
Section 18's public service oath creates legally enforceable obligations which establish personal liability for implementing government policy without obstruction. The voluntary nature of the voting rights waiver acknowledges the tension between political neutrality and democratic participation whilst ensuring those who shape policy are not simultaneously participating in the electoral process which determines political direction.
Part 6: Military Function Protection
The prohibition on civilian bureaucratic capture of military functions addresses mission creep in defence-related activities. Section 19 transfers all intelligence, surveillance, and strategic planning functions currently exercised by civilian bodies to appropriate military commands within six months.
This represents constitutional restoration rather than militarisation, recognising civilian control of the military should operate through direct ministerial direction rather than bureaucratic intermediation. The prohibition on civilian interference with military functions carries criminal penalties, reflecting the national security implications of administrative imperialism in defence-related areas.
Part 7: Strategic Corporations as Commercial Disciplines
The establishment of five strategic corporations under Part 7 represents the Act's constructive alternative to pure abolition, acknowledging some governmental functions cannot be eliminated entirely but can be subjected to market discipline which prevents the empire-building tendencies characterising traditional public bodies.
Each corporation is strictly limited to the functions specified in its schedule and prohibited from scope creep through subsidiaries, partnerships, or functional expansion. The requirement for external recruitment of all staff prevents the transfer of bureaucratic culture from abolished bodies, whilst the commercial viability requirements ensure these organisations operate according to market principles rather than administrative convenience.
The British Earth Sciences Corporation consolidates geological surveys, meteorological services, environmental monitoring, and mapping functions under commercial discipline. Its exclusive mandate prevents the mission creep which has historically plagued environmental agencies whilst ensuring essential earth sciences capabilities remain available to government and commercial customers at full cost recovery.
The UK National Investigations Corporation handles serious fraud investigation, cross-border financial crime, accident investigation, and regulatory enforcement requiring criminal investigation standards. By consolidating these functions under commercial discipline, the Act eliminates duplicative investigation capabilities whilst ensuring specialised expertise remains available where genuinely required.
The UK Nuclear Development Corporation manages nuclear facility regulation, radioactive waste management, nuclear technology research, and decommissioning projects. This consolidation addresses the fragmented nuclear governance which has created regulatory stagnation whilst subjecting nuclear functions to commercial viability requirements.
The UK Scientific Standards Corporation encompasses measurement standards, product safety testing, medicines regulation, food safety, chemical safety assessment, and professional certification services. This creates a single entity responsible for technical standards and certification whilst eliminating the proliferation of specialist agencies which have created regulatory complexity.
The UK Transport Safety Registry Corporation manages vehicle licensing, transport safety investigation, operator certification, and dangerous goods regulation across all types of transport. This consolidation eliminates the fragmented transport agencies whilst ensuring safety-critical functions operate under commercial discipline.
Part 8: Market Primacy and Procurement Reform
Part 8 establishes market mechanisms as the default approach to public service provision, directly addressing the systematic favouritism towards governmental rather than commercial solutions which has driven administrative expansion. Section 24 requires demonstration private sector alternatives have been thoroughly explored before any new public function can be established, with emphasis on small British suppliers to prevent the development of large contractors which become part of the administrative establishment.
The procurement hierarchy established prioritises small British businesses, requires comprehensive ownership disclosure to prevent conflicts of interest, and mandates independent audits for larger contracts. This addresses the SERCO-style crony capitalism which has historically characterised government procurement whilst ensuring taxpayer value and supporting domestic enterprise.
Section 24A's anti-circumvention measures create criminal liability for contracts which facilitate functional continuity with abolished bodies, preventing the outsourcing strategies which preserved eliminated functions during previous reform efforts. The personal liability provisions for civil servants who authorise such contracts create individual accountability operating independently of administrative hierarchy or organisational culture.
Section 25's revenue generation mandate ensures new public bodies must operate commercially rather than relying on taxpayer subsidy. The automatic dissolution mechanisms for bodies failing to achieve cost recovery targets provide financial discipline previously absent from public sector operations. This represents application of market discipline to governmental functions, forcing demonstration of value through price mechanisms rather than political justification.
Part 9: Administrative Simplification and Cultural Reform
The elimination of bureaucratic bloat detailed in Part 9 addresses the internal culture of public bodies which generates administrative complexity for its own sake. Section 27 prohibits entire categories of activity which contribute to organisational expansion without delivering public value.
The prohibition on diversity programmes which substitute quotas for merit reflects recognition identity-based hiring policies create administrative overhead whilst undermining operational effectiveness. The restriction on policy development roles not directly related to operational delivery eliminates the policy entrepreneur positions driving mission creep. The limitation of communication departments to two staff members addresses the propaganda apparatus many public bodies have developed to justify their existence.
Section 28's employment and remuneration restrictions eliminate the pay review bodies and collective bargaining arrangements which have insulated public sector compensation from market forces. The prohibition on performance-related pay addresses the perverse incentives which reward expansion of responsibilities rather than efficient service delivery.
Section 29's administrative simplification eliminates the committee culture which has proliferated across government. The prohibition on meetings exceeding two hours and addressing the same subject matter multiple times forces decision-making efficiency. The thirty-day limit on consultation periods prevents the extended consultation processes which have historically been used to delay implementation of unwelcome policies.
Part 10: Personal Accountability
The introduction of personal civil liability represents a constitutional revolution in public administration, eliminating the Crown immunity which has historically protected officials from consequences of their decisions. This addresses the fundamental problem of moral hazard in public sector employment: the tendency for protected individuals to take excessive risks because they do not bear the costs of failure.
Section 30's personal liability provisions create skin in the game through direct financial consequences which line up individual incentives with public interest. The prohibition on public funding for legal defence ensures protection cannot be socialised whilst consequences remain privatised, addressing the privatise profits, socialise losses problem.
The post-employment restrictions prevent the revolving door between public and private sectors which can create conflicts of interest and regulatory capture by regulated industries. The ten-year prohibition on employment with entities subject to previous official duties ensures genuine separation between regulatory and commercial interests.
Section 30A establishes comprehensive post-employment monitoring through an independent Ethics Vetting Authority operating as a Community Interest Company. This creates commercial discipline in ethics oversight whilst ensuring comprehensive tracking of former officials' activities to prevent circumvention of employment restrictions.
Part 11: Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence
The criminal penalties create deterrent effects which operate independently of administrative culture or political pressure. Section 31's offence of administrative obstructionism reflects recognition systematic resistance to democratic direction represents bureaucratic usurpation of elected authority through administrative means.
Schedule 1 provides comprehensive definition of prohibited obstructionist practices organised into four categories which anticipate strategic adaptation by administrative systems. Procedural manipulation encompasses creating unnecessary approval stages, prolonging consultations beyond statutory requirements, and establishing committees for decisions which can be made by individual officials. The definition captures the bureaucratic tendency to create complexity where simplicity would suffice.
Information obstruction includes withholding relevant data from ministers, providing incomplete briefings, and overwhelming recipients with irrelevant detail to obscure key points. This addresses the information asymmetries which have historically allowed civil servants to manipulate political decision-making through selective disclosure and deliberate complexity.
Resource and function expansion covers creating additional posts without clear justification, expanding organisational remits beyond statutory authority, and developing internal procedures which exceed legal obligations. This prevents the empire-building which occurs through incremental expansion of roles and responsibilities beyond original mandates.
Circumvention and evasion addresses creative interpretation of legislation to expand rather than restrict scope, establishing informal processes to bypass accountability mechanisms, and using external arrangements to maintain abolished functions. This category recognises sophisticated administrative systems will attempt to preserve their essential functions through alternative organisational arrangements.
The progressive penalty system allows for graduated responses whilst maintaining serious consequences for persistent offenders. First-time violations (Bernard Woolley) result in formal penalties and monitoring, whilst repeat offenders face dismissal and permanent exclusion from public employment. Senior officials (Sir Humphrey) face immediate dismissal and extended disqualification, recognising their greater responsibility for organisational culture.
Part 12: Constitutional Safeguards and Limited Judicial Review
The judicial review limitations in Part 12 acknowledge legitimate concerns about executive overreach whilst preventing courts from undermining the Act's fundamental objectives through expansive interpretation of procedural rights. Section 35 restricts judicial intervention to procedural unfairness, ultra vires actions, or manifest irrationality, eliminating the broader grounds which have enabled systematic judicial protection of administrative structures.
This represents application of what US administrative law scholars call "hard look" review : intensive scrutiny of procedural compliance combined with substantial deference to substantive policy choices. The maintenance of odiously-drafted and foreign-inspired Human Rights Act protections ensures fundamental liberties remain protected whilst enabling administrative reform.
Section 36's override of conflicting legislation is carefully limited to specific provisions rather than creating general executive supremacy. The explicit preservation of Human Rights Act interpretative framework demonstrates the Act seeks governmental efficiency rather than authoritarian control.
Part 13: Democratic Renewal and Constitutional Entrenchment
The democratic protection measures in Part 13 address legitimate concerns about constitutional entrenchment whilst ensuring extraordinary reform measures remain subject to popular control. Section 39's requirement for either manifesto commitment followed by simple majorities or referendum approval for fundamental amendments prevents casual reversal whilst maintaining democratic legitimacy.
The ten-year sunset clause for the Act itself requires periodic democratic renewal, ensuring these extraordinary measures remain temporary corrections rather than permanent constitutional features. This acknowledges constitutional reform should be self-limiting rather than entrenching particular policy preferences beyond democratic revision.
Organisational Conversion Framework
Schedule 17 establishes a comprehensive framework for converting public bodies to alternative legal structures which preserve essential functions whilst introducing commercial discipline and stakeholder accountability. The conversion programme recognises some organisations provide genuine public value but can operate more efficiently under different governance arrangements.
Community Interest Companies receive bodies requiring commercial discipline with community benefit objectives. The Disclosure and Barring Service conversion to CIC status allows criminal record checking to operate on full cost recovery whilst maintaining service availability. HM Land Registry's conversion enables property registration to operate commercially whilst reinvesting surplus profits in service improvements rather than general taxation.
Charitable Company Limited by Guarantee status suits cultural institutions which can generate revenue through admissions, commercial partnerships, and educational programmes whilst maintaining charitable objectives. The British Museum, National Gallery, and major cultural institutions would operate through visitor contributions, research contracts, and charitable fundraising rather than direct government grants.
Public Benefit Corporation status applies to organisations with mixed commercial and public benefit objectives requiring flexibility with mission protection. The BBC's conversion to PBC status would eliminate the licence fee whilst preserving public service broadcasting obligations through constitutional requirements rather than political direction.
Co-operative structures suit member-owned organisations serving specific constituencies. The British Cattle Movement Service conversion to farmer-owned co-operative ensures those who use the service control its operation whilst government retains access to animal health data through contractual arrangements.
Community Benefit Societies serve wider community interests through democratic governance and asset protection. Network Rail's conversion would preserve railway infrastructure management under collective ownership whilst introducing commercial discipline through track access charges and property income.
The National Park Authority conversions to Community Benefit Societies comprised of relevant parish councils represent genuine localisation of environmental management. Rather than central government appointment of board members, local communities would directly control park management through their elected councils whilst maintaining environmental protection obligations.
We Make No Apology
The Restraint of Bureaucratic Overreach Act emerges from recognition bureaucratic systems have evolved survival mechanisms which consistently defeat incremental reform efforts. The techniques of passive resistance, procedural manipulation, and functional regeneration represent adaptive responses to periodic selection pressure from democratic oversight.
The Act's comprehensive scope reflects requisite variety , i.e. the principle control systems must be at least as complex as the systems they seek to regulate. Seven decades of bureaucratic evolution have created institutional capabilities which require correspondingly sophisticated countermeasures to overcome. Sir Humphrey's isn't going quietly.
The alternative to such constitutional engineering is continued drift toward administrative state capture through governance by unelected officials operating through procedures which insulate them from democratic direction. The Public Bodies Act 2011 demonstrated good intentions and flexible powers are insufficient to overcome evolved bureaucratic resistance. Only constitutional surgery can restore Parliamentary sovereignty through mechanisms which fix bureaucratic incentives with public interest rather than administrative self-preservation.
This represents not ideological preference for minimal government but practical recognition of the institutional behaviours which have systematically frustrated democratic control of administrative expansion. The Act seeks to restore democratic equilibrium through constitutional mechanisms which recognise and counteract the natural tendencies of the Blob to expand beyond its own democratic mandate.
The success of this constitutional reset will ultimately depend not on its legal mechanisms but on the political commitment to maintain the discipline it imposes. The democratic protection provisions ensure this commitment must be periodically renewed, preventing the legislation from becoming merely another layer of constitutional complexity. In seeking to restore limited government, the Act recognises constitutional arrangements must coincide with rather than contradict institutional incentives, creating sustainable discipline for efficient administration rather than relying solely on periodic political pressure against evolved bureaucratic resistance.